Executive summary format
A completed report starts by explaining the few constraints most likely to affect organic growth. It does not make the client interpret hundreds of crawler warnings. The summary separates verified facts, likely consequences, and decisions that require business context.
Primary diagnosis
The website has a useful service offer, but search signals are split between duplicate homepage variants and high-value pages do not clearly match commercial query intent. Search engines can crawl the site, yet consolidation and page targeting should be resolved before expanding content.
- First: consolidate hosts, index files, and canonical signals.
- Second: rebuild the primary service page around the commercial query and buyer questions.
- Then: publish supporting evidence and educational content.
Example finding structure
Duplicate homepage variants dilute canonical signals
Evidence: the root, www host, and `/index.html` return equivalent indexable content. The tested pages do not all redirect directly to one preferred URL.
Why it matters: duplicate entry points can split links, reporting, and search-engine interpretation. They also make future migrations and measurement harder.
Recommended action: choose one HTTPS host, redirect every alternate host and index-file variant in one 301 hop, and add a self-referencing canonical in the initial HTML.
Acceptance test: the canonical page returns 200; each alternate returns one 301 directly to it; the rendered and source canonical match.
Primary page does not match the intended commercial query
Evidence: the service is named in pricing, but the H1 and opening passage use abstract growth language. The exact commercial phrase appears too late for visitors and search systems to immediately identify the offer.
Recommended action: place the service phrase naturally in the title, H1, and opening explanation; keep the page focused on ready-to-buy visitors; use a separate guide for broad educational intent.
Important mobile targets are smaller than the safe touch area
Evidence: rendered mobile inspection shows a readable link whose clickable height is below 44 pixels.
Recommended action: increase the clickable area with padding or minimum height while keeping the visual text size unchanged. Re-test at 375 pixels and with 200% text zoom.
How the 90-day roadmap is organized
- Days 1–7 — foundations: indexing blockers, redirects, canonicals, sitemap, structured data, critical trust and conversion issues.
- Days 8–30 — proof and depth: expert identity, methodology, report examples, case evidence, intent-specific educational content, and usability resilience.
- Days 31–90 — growth: topic coverage, measurement, authority building, field performance monitoring, and drift detection.
Each task is linked back to evidence and given an owner, effort range, dependency, and acceptance criterion. This makes the roadmap usable by an owner, marketer, or developer without needing to reinterpret the audit.
What the delivered audit includes
- A focused report with an executive summary and category findings.
- A prioritized tracker with affected URLs, evidence, impact, effort, and acceptance criteria.
- Screenshots or code excerpts where they materially clarify the issue.
- A keyword and content opportunity map when supported by search evidence.
- A 90-day roadmap and a 30-minute handover call.
The actual findings depend on the website, market, platform, and available data. The sample intentionally avoids invented traffic, revenue, rankings, client names, or testimonials. For a real outcome example, read the Elastas.lt SEO case study. For the investigation behind the report, see the audit methodology.
How to use the report
The report is designed for decisions, not passive reading. Start with the executive summary and confirm that the business priorities are represented correctly. Then assign an owner to every first-sprint action and record any platform, access, legal, or content dependency. A developer may need exact redirect behavior, while a writer needs the target intent and evidence requirements. The same finding can therefore produce different implementation tasks.
After each change, run the stated acceptance test and preserve the result. Search Console inspection, response headers, rendered HTML, screenshots, and conversion tests can confirm that the implementation matches the recommendation. Record the deployment date so later performance changes can be interpreted against a real timeline. Items that cannot yet be implemented should stay visible with a reason and next review date rather than disappearing from the plan.
Want this level of clarity for your site?
The €299 audit applies this reporting structure to your real pages and priorities.
Request an SEO audit